Suggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Samples were collected at the end of the dive, kept in hermetic boxes containing vent seawater, brought onboard about 1.5 hours later, and immediately measured and dissected to minimize sampling effect.
Similar(59)
For each exposure, ovaries from 6 replicate fish were sliced into 12 ± 5 mg pieces and randomly distributed across sample culture wells to minimize sample effects due to potential tissue heterogeneity.
To maximize power and minimize sample size effects, an alpha value larger or equal to 0.05 was sought.
From samples with >100 individuals available (Table 1), a sub-set of 100 individuals was chosen at random for subsequent analyses in order to minimize sample size effects.
This choice was supported by observing that for K=10, (1) the global likelihood maximum was indeed probably reached and (2) the CV index values were close to the lowest ones at K=9. Subsequently, a sub-set of 24 individuals was chosen at random from each European and Near-Eastern ancestry population for the following analyses in order to minimize sample size effects.
To minimize this effect, samples were pooled to obtain two distinct pools in both, PsA and PsC groups.
In cohorts where the sample size was >100, one hundred randomly chosen samples were used for analysis to minimize the sample size effect, resulting in a total of 1,564 samples.
200 clusters of 9 families were selected to ensure broad sampling and minimize cluster effect; these were divided into sub-sections proportional to population size.
Experiments were performed at 37 °C for SP-A in water and SDS and DPC samples, but at 25 °C for LMPC, LMPG, and LMPC + LMPG samples to minimize the effect of thermal convection.
To simplify the analysis, donors were selected who are homozygous for both CA repeat length and the C-52T allele; to minimize any effect of sample manipulation, platelet surface α2β1 content was measured in whole blood, as previously described [10].
The two swabs were collected first and second alternately, to minimize the effect of sample variation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com