Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Then we let ω increase from 1 to 13, combine the binary minimal parity matrices for the minimal polynomials mI(1)(x)…mI x), in order to form H ω by Equation 52, and calculate the LCs of H ω × C r = 0(1 ≤ ω ≤ q) by Equation 48.
where λ ω (1 ≤ ω ≤ q) denotes the index of L m λ ω x in L. Step 3: Let ω increase from 1 to q, combine the binary minimal parity matrices for the minimal polynomials m λ 1 x … m λ ω x, in order to form H ω as follows: H ω = H b min ( m λ 1 x ) H b min ( m λ 2 x ) ⋮ H b min ( m λ ω x ), 1 ≤ ω ≤ q (52).
Similar(58)
The code length and synchronization positions are estimated by checking the minimal parity-check matrices.
According to these coefficients of m λ (x), we can obtain the minimal polynomial-based binary, minimal parity-check matrix Hbmin(m λ (x)) with the following steps.
Therefore, we can simply obtain the minimal parity-check matrices of the shortened codes by deleting the first l s columns of Hbmin(m λ (x)).
According to Equation 45, we can calculate the k th syndrome for a given minimal parity-check matrix of Hbmin(m λ (x)).
G = I | Q, (24) 3) The minimal parity-check matrix can be obtained as follows: H b min m λ x = Q T | I (25) .
H4 is obtained by combining the minimal parity-check matrices Hbmin(m4 x)), Hbmin(m1 x)), Hbmin(m2 x)) and Hbmin(m3 x)).
These minimal polynomials have the minimal parity-check matrices with low rows, so the adaptive processing can only reduce the influence for low number of unreliable decision bits.
The details of the additional steps are listed below: Step 6: List the binary minimal parity-check matrices over GF(2 m ) which have low rows: Hbmin mL 1 x)), Hbmin mL 2 x)),…, Hbmin mL η(x)), here η represents the number of binary minimal parity-check matrices with low rows.
Therefore, the number of rows of the binary minimal parity-check matrices Hbmin(m1 x)), Hbmin(m2 x)) and Hbmin(m3 x)) corresponding to m1 x), m2 x) and m3 x) are also 6, 3, and 1, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com