Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Our results are based on two different approaches for determining the minimal important difference (MID), including a distributional approach and a patient-based anchoring technique.
Median scores, however, differed substantially (0.69 versus 0.60), a difference exceeding the minimal important difference of both instruments.
The minimal important difference can be helpful in interpreting data from clinical trials.
A one-unit change in the TDI focal score represented the minimal important difference.
We compared the minimal important difference (MID) with the minimal detectable change (MDC) generated by distribution-based methods.
The objective of the study was to calculate the minimal important difference for improvement on the VAS scale for women with endometriosis.
The objective of this review is to summarize recommendations on methods for evaluating responsiveness and minimal important difference (MID) for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.
To compare results from meta-analyses for mean differences in minimal important difference (MID) units (MDMID), when MID is treated as a random variable vs. a constant.
Intuitive grasp of the minimal important difference guides the choice of how many points to have on a scale for this purpose.
The minimal important difference (MID) will also be calculated.
To assess interpretability, the minimal important difference (MID) was examined.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com