Exact(8)
Nordenfelt takes us far by defining health as the abilities to achieve vital goals that lead to minimal happiness or minimally decent life.
To undermine that argument would entail going back and objecting to Nordenfelt's reasoning about health as being able to realize goals necessary and sufficient for minimal happiness; that is, a minimally flourishing, decent, non-humiliating life in the modern world.
Because Lily has not achieved her minimal happiness according to Nordenfelt's theory, she is not healthy.
Minimal happiness or flourishing is conceptualized as the outcome-states or achieving goals, but the health of a person is her abilities to achieve vital goals.
Schramme's critique is that the inability of Lily to achieve minimal happiness because her ambitions outstripped her physical talents should not render her unhealthy.
In formal terms, Nordenfelt's theory of health is as follows: 15 A is in health if, and only if, A has the ability, given standard circumstances, to realize his vital goals, i.e. the set of goals which are necessary and together sufficient for his minimal happiness.
Similar(52)
Some would argue that the effect of money, whatever it is, can only ever be minimal because individual happiness is based on completely different criteria.
All the frazzled people in this amazingly populous novel act pretty heedlessly, obeying impulses of which they are not always fully aware, and in some weird way their lack of principles serves them well, not necessarily protecting them from harm but at least supplying, moment to moment, some minimal possibility of happiness — a sense of being alive.
Right from the start, the basic philosophical underpinning of most of the positive psychology movement has been that our circumstances (including our financial circumstances) are of minimal consequence to our happiness.
Of course, unless I have the luck of being born rich, my work must also generate enough income to provide me the minimal goods without which happiness is not even possible.
The way I see it, my working-mother friends who have climbed up corporate and legal ladders have put in the hours and effort and have been acknowledged for their work in typically male-dominated hierarchies; these women serve as good role models for little girls, while still having time (however minimal) and contributing to the happiness of their family and friends.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com