After cleaning with detergent, only minimal amounts of ssDNA_ODN were detected after 10 and 20 minutes; however, after 25 minutes, no ssDNA_ODN could be detected.
As shown in Table 1, the minimal concentration of the detergents sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and deoxycholate (DOC) that inhibited 50% of bacterial growth (MIC50) were similar for the Δ stf0 mutant and WT Mtb.
The detergents were all tested at a total concentration of 2%, since this was the minimal concentration at which these detergents provided partial transient protection.
Most of the lipases were not affected by this concentration of detergents because lower concentration of detergents was suspected to have minimal influence on the lipases.
When applied at the minimal concentration needed for brief partial protection, all five detergents caused a subsequent increase in susceptibility at 12 hours of ~20 30-fold ~20 30-fold
The role of chlorine, chloramine, chlorine dioxide, ozone, and multiple other disinfectants and detergents in the hot tub setting is minimal, given the resistance of MAC to these agents.
Collectively, these methods are used to produce a wide range of mid to high carbon chain length alcohols with single to minimal mono-methyl branching, all of which find their way into detergent manufacture.
A single copy of YidC suffices for the binding of translating ribosome both in detergent and at the lipid membrane interface, thus being the minimal functional unit.
Minimal differences in the affinities were observed compared to data obtained using DDM detergent suggesting a very limited influence of the different detergents on binding activity of the compounds.
As expected on the basis of cell-based tests, the detergents were significantly protective in the "mix externally" method at the minimal concentrations that inactivate HSV and HIV virions in vitro, ~0.03% [ 31, 33].
