Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(19)
Further, the minimal detectable difference of a developed model is often not reported.
The minimal detectable difference in lung tumor multiplicity for the current study was 37%.
Three independent experiments were conducted to determine the reliability, accuracy and minimal detectable difference of the marker set and model.
LED-test performance ranged between 88.6 and 119.6 N, test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC 2,3)=0.94), and the minimal detectable difference was 5.5 N.
Minimal detectable difference (MDD90) thresholds were defined for each joint; tibiocalcaneal joint – MDD90 = 2.17 9.36°, tarsometatarsal joint – MDD90 = 1.03 9.29° and the metatarsophalangeal joint – MDD90 = 1.75 9.12°.
Absolute reliability was determined by estimating the standard error of measurement SEM = (SD√1 − ICC) and the minimal detectable difference MDD = 1.96 × √2 × SEM.
Similar(41)
Estimates of minimal detectable differences (two sided α = 0.05) are given in Table 4, for different numbers of asthma cases identified [ 46- 50].> -wrap-foot> * Based on references [ 46- 50].
Minimal detectable differences with optimized power were calculated in each comparison according to number of patients accrued.
To this end, two approaches have been proposed in the literature – minimal detectable differences, and the statistical equivalence.
These figures were thought as relevant minimal detectable differences.
Minimal detectable differences are also presented for both standardised effect sizes and proportions for 80% power.
More suggestions(15)
minimal detectable weight
minimal detectable peak
minimal detectable Δ[Ca2+]i
minimal detectable bias
minimal detectable cort
minimal detectable sound
minimal detectable corticosterone
minimal detectable frequency
minimal relevant difference
minimal detectable change
minimal detectable concentration
minimal detectable amount
minimal detectable displacement
minimal detectable dose
minimal clinical difference
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com