Sentence examples for mineralization efficiency of from inspiring English sources

The separation and injection of photogenerated charge carriers significantly affect the mineralization efficiency of volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

Furthermore, the study also contains the intermediates and the mineralization efficiency of electrolysis, Fenton, electro-Fenton and photoelectro-Fenton process.

The reduced mineralization efficiency of other phenolic pollutants (4-chlorophenol, phenol, methylene blue, rhodamine B, and acid orange 7) was also observed on F-TiO2.

Relatively high mineralization efficiency of PPN solution (82% TOC removal) was achieved by AO with Ti4O7 anode at 120 mA after 480 min of treatment, whereas almost complete mineralization (96% TOC removal) was reached at similar conditions in EF process.

At this reaction time, the system reached a total mineralization efficiency of 57.23%, and the effluent toxicity increased by 65% due to the possible generation of by-products that are more toxic than the parent compound.

This EC/EF system exhibited much higher degradation rate, decholorination and mineralization efficiency of atrazine than the electrochemical (EC) and electrochemical/traditional electro-Fenton (EC/TEF) oxidation counterpart systems without Fe@Fe2O3 core-shell nanowires.

Experimentally, the results have shown interesting degradation and mineralization efficiency (on the order of 94% for degradation and 76% for mineralization).

The degradation and carbon mineralization efficiencies of the target contaminants were investigated at different initial concentrations.

CO2 injection could also increase mineralization efficiency – kilograms of CO2 sequestered per kilogram of peridotite – by a factor of over 350.

Under the optimum conditions, phenol removal reached almost 100% after 40 min and the mineralization efficiency in terms of TOC exceeded 85% after 120 min.

The black NiO/TiO2 hybrids Exhibit 80% of photodegradation conversion and 56% of mineralization efficiency, which are 7.9 and 4.5 times higher than those of TiO2 NRs.