Suggestions(1)
Exact(6)
The "Changing minds" questionnaire displays poor internal consistency reliability and rather problematic overall test-retest reliability.
The results from the "Changing minds" questionnaire display at best a moderate agreement between the test and retest.
For the Changing Minds questionnaire almost one fifth (17.9%) of the items present poor test-retest reliability and the alpha coefficient for the subscales ranges between 0.19 - 0.46.
The fact that the "Changing minds" questionnaire was used as a self-rating instrument and the information in the original studies was obtained through interviews might make a difference.
Weighted kappa, < 0.20 poor agreement, 0.21-0.40 fair, 0.41-0.60 moderate, 0.61-0.80 good, 0.81-1.00 very good (Altman, 1991) The complete "Changing minds" questionnaire consists of 56 items and 10 of these (17.9%) present poor test-retest reliability, 26 items (46.4%) fair and finally 20 items (35.7%) moderate test-retest reliability.
Weighted kappa, < 0.20 poor agreement, 0.21-0.40 fair, 0.41-0.60 moderate, 0.61-0.80 good, 0.81-1.00 very good (Altman, 1991) The investigation of the test-retest reliability in attitudes towards the mentally ill during a three week period indicates a certain level of instability in attitudes as measured with the "Changing minds" questionnaire and FABI.
Similar(54)
The aims of the study were: - to investigate test-retest reliability of the Swedish versions of the self-report inventory: FABI and of the "Changing Minds"- questionnaire - to examine the internal consistency of the two instruments Permission to translate the instruments was obtained from the original authors.
The Mind-Wandering Questionnaire (MWQ) (Mrazek, 2013), is a self-report 5-item questionnaire that evaluates the levels of the mind-wandering trait.
A recently developed measure to evaluate this phenomenon is the Mind-Wandering Questionnaire (MWQ).
In the last few years, the Mind-Wandering Questionnaire (MWQ) was developed.
The objective of the present study was to translate into Spanish and analyze the psychometric properties of the Mind-Wandering Questionnaire (MWQ) with adolescents.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com