Sentence examples for min per lesion from inspiring English sources

Exact(1)

This data extraction took 1 2 min per lesion.

Similar(59)

Considering detection of all malignant and benign lesions, 5 min-per-view MBI had lower sensitivity (mean of 70% vs. 85% (p ≤ 0.04) for two readers) and lower area under curve (AUC) (mean of 92.7 vs. 99.6, p ≤ 0.01) but had similar specificity (p = 1.0).

MBI performed at 5 min-per-view demonstrated decreased sensitivity for lesion detection, similar specificity, and decreased AUC compared to standard 10-min-per-view MBI.

Eleven of the 15 (73%) test-negative lesions on 5 min-per-view or 5-min-per-view WBR acquisitions received a final assessment of 3 (probably benign) by either one or both readers, indicating that the lesion was observed but not given a test positive assessment of 4 or 5 that would lead to recommendation of biopsy.

Of all 15 lesions with downgraded assessments at 5 min-per-view, 12 of 15 (80%) were categorized as mild intensity lesions and the other 3 of 15 (20%) were moderate intensity.

All lesions downgraded at 5 min-per-view (Table 3) were in patients with photopenic or mild background uptake.

Note: in one additional patient, a benign lesion was considered undetected at 10 min-per-view (assessment = 3) but was detected at 5 min-per-view and 5 min-per-view with WBR (assessment of 4) by reader 1.

aFinal assessment is given for lesions detected by either reader on 10-min-per-view acquisitions but not detected by at least one reader on 5 min-per-view or 5-min-per-view WBR acquisitions.

Considering detection of all 49 malignant and benign lesions, sensitivity was significantly lower for 5-min-per-view studies compared to 10-min-per-view for both readers; specificity was nearly unchanged.

Of lesions that were test positive on 10 min-per-view, but test negative at 5 min-per-view (Table 3), only one was in a low count density study.

In 15 patients, a lesion that was detected (assessment 4 or 5) on 10-min-per-view MBI by either reader was given a test negative assessment of 1 to 3 on the 5 min-per-view or 5-min-per-view WBR study by either one or both readers (Table 3).

Show more...

Ludwig, your English writing platform

Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.

Student

Used by millions of students, scientific researchers, professional translators and editors from all over the world!

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

Get started for free

Unlock your writing potential with Ludwig

Letters

Most frequent sentences: