Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(22)
Analysis of fluorescence intensity showed that the concentration of rhodamine 6G was higher on the ipsilateral side up to 60 min after microinjection.
In addition, monocytes displayed a less polarized phenotype at 70 min after microinjection of MCP-1 as compared to neutrophils (Fig 8E), nevertheless these values were not significant.
Spatial dynamics of the fluorescence intensity were measured before and within 60 min after microinjection and expressed as mean gray value [39].
The vessel and the surrounding tissue were visualized during a time period of 5 min at baseline conditions before stimulation as well within 60 min after microinjection.
Curve-line velocity of neutrophils was significantly reduced at 70 and 80 min as compared to that at 60 min after microinjection of MCP-1.
Interestingly, straight-line velocity and directionality of monocytes were slightly increased after 70 min and 80 min after microinjection of MCP-1 as compared to those after 60 min (Fig. 8C, D).
Similar(38)
Brains were processed for Fos-like immunoreactivity, 75 min after microinjections.
The percentage recovery from brain of [C]inulin, a non-permeable marker, was 50.9 �� 11.3% (n = 5), 31.0 ± 7.5% (n = 3) and 38.8 ± 6.4% (n = 3) at 5 min, 20 min and 40 min, respectively, after microinjection in LPS-treated mice.
In the microinjection experiments, 15 30 min after the microinjection we determined the number of surviving Alexa Fluor® 594-labelled mononucleated cells with nuclei labelled with Hoechst.
In a separate set of experiments, the effect of the Rho kinase inhibitor Y-27632 on leukocyte motility was analyzed at 60 and 90 min after perivenular microinjection of MIP-1α.
When sites were moved posteriorly into the caudal half of shell, muscimol microinjection suppressed or nearly abolished positive-valence hedonic reactions that are normally emitted to sucrose taste (e.g., tongue protrusions and paw licking) at both 15 min and 1 hr after microinjection (15 min: F 1,9) = 10.970, p = .009; 1 hr: F 1,10) = 11.962, p = .006; Fig. 3, 5, Fig S1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com