Sentence examples for mildly significant from inspiring English sources

The nature of the scorers sprinkled a bit of magic dust on an otherwise only mildly significant occasion.

The effect of past matches on formation changes was mildly significant between (tilde{tau} = 2) and (tilde{tau} approx5).

It is also worthwhile to notice that, in columns [1] and [2], there is a mildly significant and negative relationship between the propensity to support the Senate plan and the state-specific fraction of legal immigrants.42 It is still the case that the fraction of illegal immigrants is positively and significantly correlated with the pro_lenient_plan dummy, mildly so in column [3].

There's something, probably mildly significant, to be said about the reduction of a human being to a set of numbers, but this is a piece about a tawdry bit of masturbatory nonsense that sold a lot of records and kept Kleenex in business for a while so we'll leave that article to someone a bit brighter.

By multivariate analysis, the mean ER (P=0.040) and PR (P=0.031) levels, tumour grade (P<0.0001) and DNA ploidy (P=0.0021) were independently associated with age, after controlling for race, T and N stages, tumour size and grade, whereas the KI was not significant (P=0.469) and p53 was mildly significant (P=0.064).

Respectively in these cell lines, the cell survival was maximally (p<0.01), moderately (p<0.05) or mildly (not significant) affected by a single exposure to 1,200 mJ/cm2 of UVB (Figure 4B) compared to the parental N-hTERT cells.

These women are at mildly but significant risk of CIN3+ (13.2%).

For the deepest (low, 50 μm depth) section, mildly statistically significant results were observed, with p-values<0.05 *.

Upon multivariable adjustment, estimates were mildly potentiated; significant adjusted associations were observed for all-cause mortality (7 % greater risk), heart failure/volume overload (14%% greater risk), and MACE+ (14%% greater risk).

Normalized T-Scores according to the US norms are provided for each subscale with a score of > 60 (> 1 SD from mean) indicating a mildly atypical (possible significant) problem and scores of > 65 indicating a significant problem (markedly atypical) [ 23].

Furthermore, each of these SNPs was mildly to moderately significant in the meta-analysis, but as in the initial GWAS follow-up, these loci fall far enough from the top that they are not initially selected for limited follow-up.