Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
True to its light-beer form, it's 4.9% alcohol with a relatively mild score of 29 in International Bittering Units.
Closer examination of the "gas" symptoms showed 2 groups of subjects: one ("asymptomatic") who reported none (score of 1), and the other ("symptomatic") who reported mild (score of 2), moderate (score of 3), and, in a single instance, severe (score of 4) symptoms.
Similar(58)
A score up to 4 indicates the absence of depression, scores of 5 9 represent mild, scores of 10 14 represent moderate and scores of 15 and higher represent severe depression [ 33].
A score up to 4 indicates the absence of depression, scores of 5 9 represent mild, scores of 10 14 represent moderate and scores of 15 and higher represent severe depression [ 35, 36].
A score up to 4 indicates the absence of generalized anxiety disorder, scores of 5 9 represent mild, scores of 10 14 represent moderate and scores of 15 and higher represent severe anxiety symptoms levels [ 35].
When categorized by severity of mild (score ≤ 9) and moderate depression (score ≥ 10), 90 teens (78.9%) had a score ≤ 9 and 24 (21.1%) had a score ≥10.
Staging of treatment resistance was also performed according to three categories of severity: mild (score = 3 6), moderate (score = 7 10), and severe (score = 11 15).
Based on the total score patients were classified into four groups with increasing severity level: none to mild (total score of 0 to ≤24), mild to moderate (total score of >24 to ≤48), moderate to severe (total score of >49 to ≤72), and severe to extreme (total score of >72 to ≤96).
The BDI-II results showed that none of the obese women had severe depressive symptoms; only one felt in the category of mild depression (score of 14), and the others had even lower scores (scores 0 to 13).
Scores of 0 or 1 indicate clinically mild infections; scores of >2 indicate moderate to severe infections.
The mild anxiety scores of both groups measured at primary follow-up were unchanged from the baseline measurement.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com