Despite these facts we find a main migration pattern (subsidence and posterior tilt) of our tibial implants that are very similar to those migration patterns found in previous studies [13, 16, 17, 18].
Early migration [6], continuous migration [7], and subsidence in combination with medial and posterior migration [6] are of concern.
While this is clearly not the case for our analyses because some of the regions were submerged and thus unavailable for plant migration, the results highlight our hypothesis of a refuge in the center of distribution and posterior migration to the north and to the south.
One model is that SDN-1 might be generally required for migration in both anterior and posterior directions, whereas MIG-13 cooperates with SDN-1 in anterior, but not posterior migration.
In this study, the biomechanical model developed predicts an initial upward and posterior migration of the humeral head, followed by an inferior and anterior movement, which is in good agreement with the literature.
For example, the extension and posterior migration of muscle proceeded normally.
There was also a tendency of medial and posterior migration if the size of the implant was considered too small.
These data indicate that SDN-1 is required for both anterior and posterior migration, consistent with weak PQR defects observed in sdn-1 mutants.
Migration of Anterior- and Posterior-Streak Cells Expressing GFP, Wild-Type GFP PTEN, or GFP in the Presence of the PI3-Kinase Inhibitor LY294002 LY294002 was used at 50 μM.
Loss of gyc76C resulted in glands that failed to invaginate, complete posterior migration and had branched lumens.
