Sentence examples for might expect differences from inspiring English sources

Because there is the potential for these scenarios to result in two very different immunological states, we might expect differences in their immune traits and fate.

It has been proposed in the present review that there may be different etiologies or different reproductive patterns according to race, and thus one might expect differences in the heterogeneity of gene expression between the races.

Accordingly, we might expect differences in E-Conjunction processing between manga readers, who likely store these schematic structures as part of their "visual language" fluency, and readers of American comics, for whom such structures are less entrenched.

Consequently one might expect differences for the distribution of the weights given by the mutations.

Expressed as a proportion of DALYs attributable to: NCDs, nutritional deficiencies and injuries The studies reviewed here raise a further question concerning the extent to which we might expect differences in the number of studies aimed at non-communicable diseases compared to communicable diseases in developing countries.

Secondly, whereas we might expect differences in behaviours according to gender [ 47] or year in school, we chose to use mixed-gender focus groups including students of different study years and disciplines, allowing us to create interaction between both genders with a variety of study experience and backgrounds, which in turn generated a greater diversity in opinion within each focus group.

One might also expect differences in the upstream promoter regions of the Glyma04g35130 BURP between CS and CG genes based on the dramatic transcript level differences between the two genotypes as shown by DGE and confirmed by RNA blotting.

As goblet cells are often increased in asthmatic airways, one might therefore expect differences in cellular uptake to impact on RTLF ascorbate concentrations compared with the healthy population, that is, lower extracellular vitamin C concentrations due to increased uptake by goblet cells.

Furthermore, we might expect systematic differences in variability across different toolmaking methods.

If so, we might expect these differences in amount of change to help explain the differences in subjects' detection and localization rates across these categories.

As shown in Supplementary Figure S2a c, the distributions (log-transformed F/RPKMs are shown for clarity) are different when taken 'as is', but one might expect the differences to level after selecting only those 13 323 genes for which an expression value was reported in all four studies.