Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Studies that did not contain data on HRH or solely data on professions other than administration and management (i.e. physicians, nurses or midwives) were excluded.
Women not expected to have a normal pregnancy (as determined by the midwives) were excluded.
However, of those who participated in the main study 8 midwives were excluded due to incomplete questionnaires and the data obtained from the remaining 292 midwives were analyzed.
fThree Senior Consultant Midwives were excluded from participating in the study since they were authors of this article and did not respond the questionnaire.
The second post hoc sensitivity analysis in which midwives were excluded led to an unchanged result (OR 2.45, 95%CI 1.51-3.98; p < 0.001).
Midwives were excluded from this study because they had no role in the delivery process, except for assisting doctors, according to policies at those hospitals.
Similar(53)
Furthermore, women lacking additionally linked data and women who did not start prenatal care with a primary care midwife were excluded.
Midwives who did not wish to take part in the study and midwives in training were excluded.
Of the 1,687 potentially eligible women attending the 69 antenatal clinics attended by the research midwife, 82% were excluded after a brief review of the medical record, mainly due to gestation outside the eligible range.
Skills that were out of scope of nurse-midwives practice in India were excluded (such as 'using Doppler to monitor foetal heart rate').
Senior midwifery managers and midwives who only provided antenatal care were excluded.
More suggestions(15)
deliveries were excluded
midwives were restricted
midwives were obtained
midwives were scheduled
midwives were combined
midwives were licensed
midwives were informed
midwives were needed
midwives were surveyed
midwives were recruited
midwives were scared
midwives were asked
midwives were interviewed
midwives were alarmed
midwives were trained
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com