Sentence examples for midrange or high from inspiring English sources

In general, the benefit of various interventions was different for students with low ACT scores in comparison with those with midrange or high ACT scores.

It is interesting to note that the benefits of the writing assignment appear limited to students with midrange or high ACT scores.

A post hoc analysis using the Holm-Sidak procedure revealed that students in the low ACT group significantly increased their performance on the postexam assessments following the discussion activity and written corrections in comparison with either the midrange (p = 0.010) or high (p = 0.017) ACT groups.

Greater mean SBP responses were observed for participants who were male, younger, non-Latino, or African American; did not use antihypertensive medications or insulin; and had midrange resting SBP or higher resting diastolic blood pressure (DBP), shorter duration of diabetes, no history of CVD, or BMI <40 kg/m (Table 2).

Patients with low or high leptin levels had a steeper eGFR decline (−2.07 and −2.14 m/year/1.73 m/year) than those with midrange leptin levels (−0.82 m/year/1.73 m/year; P < 0.01), whereas patients with low leptin levels had an elevated risk of progression of albuminuria as compared with those with high leptin levels (hazard ratio 3.125 [95% CI 1.302 7.499]).

What elevates the Solo HD is that it also handles midrange and high frequencies with aplomb.

Now he packs every song with parts — low, midrange and high guitars, vocal la-las and ahs — and all the layers can make the songs overstuffed and woolly, particularly the slow ones.

This was done during respiration, phonation in midrange, and high phonation.

Fiorina and Chief Financial Officer Bob Wayman Bob Wayman acknowledge that the market for inkjet printers is not in the midrange and high end, where it has put most of its efforts, but at the low end.

Students with midrange and high ACT scores performed as demonstrated in Figure 3, with the students participating in the essay performing the best (one-way ANOVA: p = 0.005 for midrange ACTs; p = 0.004 for high ACTs).

Students with low ACT scores benefited equally from written and discussion-based exam corrections, whereas students with midrange to high ACT scores benefited more from written than discussion-based exam corrections.