Suggestions(4)
Exact(2)
The microwave digestion method was developed and verified for the determination of arsenic in shrimp paste samples.
In this study, this step is instead completed using a microwave digestion method modified from the "EPA 3051" method used for rapid soil acid digestion.
Similar(58)
A microwave-assisted digestion method was used for sample preparation.
A microwave-assisted digestion method was implemented using factorial experimental design.
In addition, the accuracy of the method was evaluated using microwave-assisted digestion method and the results were not significantly different (at 95% confidence level).
Thus, the Mn III) microwave-assisted digestion method seems to be an interesting and promising alternative to conventional COD digestion methods since it is faster and more environmentally friendly than the ones used for the same purpose.
A microwave-assisted digestion method amenable to analysis of small size biological samples (<30 mg dry mass) has been optimized for determining twelve elements (Ag, As, Cd, Co, Cu, Cr, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Se and Zn) by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) in breast cancerous and non-cancerous biopsies.
Briefly, phosphorous concentrations were measured with microwave-assisted digestion method [45].
The objective of this study was to develop an on-tissue microwave assisted protein digestion method that optimizes the sample handling and increases the protein identification efficiency for LC-MS/MS analysis.
It is well known that open acid and microwave-assisted digestion methods can not completely dissolve the refractory minerals (Hall and Plant 1992, Totland et al. 1992 , 1995 Wu et al. 1996, Fan and Kerrich 1997, Yu et al. 2001, Navarro et al. 2008).
Thus, the use of ultrasound energy for COD determination seems to be an interesting and promising alternative to conventional open reflux and microwave-assisted digestion methods used for the same purpose since the instrumentation is simpler, cheaper and safer and the digestion step faster than the ones used for the same purpose.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com