Exact(3)
Microscopy was considered the gold standard for diagnosis of malaria infection.
Although microscopy was considered as "gold standard" for malaria diagnosis, recent reports suggest otherwise.
Because artifacts can cause weakly false-positive microscopy results, and in accordance with Peruvian policy for acid-fast microscopy, all microscopy was considered positive if ≥10 objects with the appearance of M. tuberculosis were seen [ 21].
Similar(57)
Since J-aggregate is known to emit intense fluorescence, fluorescence (FL) microscopy is considered to be a powerful tool to characterize the system.
The overall costs of resources for LED-FM and the training and convincing of laboratory personnel required to adopt frontloaded microscopy were considered major obstacles.
These amplifications yielded negative results, excluding the presences of this species (data not shown), then all Ostreopsis spp. cells observed by microscopy were considered belonging to O. cf. ovata.
Identifying the presence of autophagic vesicles by transmission electron microscopy is considered as gold standard of verifying autophagic activity.
3 Microscopy is considered the primary form of diagnosis, whereas RDTs are meant to be used in all situations where microscopy is not available.
Although microscopy is considered to be the gold standard, it is labour-intensive and its diagnostic performance critically depends on well-trained microscopists.
Mixed infections detected by microscopy were considered true negative if RDT indicated P. falciparum; true positive if RDT indicated non-falciparum in the absence of P. falciparum; and false negative if RDT indicated no malaria.
However, the risk for false-positive microscopy results was considered low, as the slides were read independently by two experienced technicians.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com