Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(16)
These are readily available from various microorganisms, do not require co-factors and accept wide range of non-natural substrates [12].
Aerobic microorganisms do not adhere to cellulose; instead, they secrete extracellular enzymes which initiate the hydrolysis resulting in the formation of cellodextrins.
Teeraphatpornchai et al. (2003) noted that PLA-degrading microorganisms always show biodegradable activity with other bioplastics, but most PBSA- or PBS-degrading microorganisms do not have the ability to degrade PLA.
The Δ13C by decomposition of SOC to CO2 (δ13C of CO2 minus δ13C of SOC) was higher than Δ13C by microbial respiration (CO2 minus MBC), demonstrating that under semiarid climate, soil microorganisms do not always preferentially decompose the most available SOC pools.
Since enzymes traditionally isolated from plants and mammalian tissues or culturable microorganisms, do not possess sufficient purity and resistance to harsh conditions of modern food processes, the use of recombinant DNA technology has made possible their utilization in current food processes.
"A critical question is if microorganisms do not only survive the residence in space but would they also be able to withstand the hostile conditions of entering a planet's atmosphere when they are situated e.g. on a meteorite," authors wrote.
Similar(44)
And microorganisms don't need to concentrate in color-changing levels in order to cause harm.
If such microorganisms did not exist, much of the organic nitrogen present in natural materials would be unavailable to plants.
Other microorganisms did not perform as well.
The presence of enteric microorganisms did not significantly influence phenanthrene release and did not reduce phenanthrene bioaccessibility in gastrointestinal chyme.
This is in line with previous findings for manure composting experiments where cultivable microorganisms did not dominate the composting process (Wakase et al. 2008).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com