Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
Carbon nanotube macro-films are two-dimensional films with micrometer thickness and centimeter by centimeter in-plane dimension.
For austenitic stainless steels an 'expanded austenite' layer of up to several tens of micrometer thickness and for aluminium alloys an AlN layer of more than 10-μm thickness were formed over a few hours.
The two compartments were separated by Matrigel (10 micrometer thickness and 8 micrometer pore size).
The two compartments were separated by a Matrigel-coated membrane (10 micrometer thickness and 8 micrometer pore size).
Entire long bones or their epiphyseal-metaphyseal ends were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin at 4°C for 2 weeks, decalcified in 7% ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), infiltrated in JB4 medium, embedded in JB4 plastic, sectioned in the coronal plane at 5 micrometer thickness and stained with 1% toluidine blue.
Tissues were decalcified in 7.5% EDTA in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide-sym collidine buffer, dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol, infiltrated and embedded in Epon 812 resin (E.F. Fullam, Inc., Latham, NY), sectioned at 1 micrometer thickness, and stained with 1% toluidine blue for light microscopic study.
Similar(54)
CuxIn films of micrometer thickness with x= 0.7, 1.0, and 1.8 were annealed up to 500 °C.
Array sections of two micrometer thickness were placed on slides and used for Fas immunohistochemistry with the monoclonal anti-Fas antibody DX2.
Samples were subsequently embedded in paraffin, sectioned at a seven micrometer thickness, mounted on glass slides and stained following a classical hematoxylin eosin procedure.
Sections of 4 micrometer thickness were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in an ethanol dilution series, followed by proteinase K digestion (30 μg/ml for 15 min at 37°C).
Needle core biopsies are formalin fixed, embedded in paraffin wax and sections cut at 3 4 micrometer thickness.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com