Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
This, however, may reflect differences in culture-dependent versus -independent techniques, the depth of microbial sequence sampling, or tissue versus faecal sampling differences.
Similar(59)
With the same microbial sequence described for sample A, the inhibition zones around sample B are 9, 11, 17, 11, and 10 mm, respectively, while sample C has 3.7, 17, 8, 11, and 2.7 mm, respectively.
We used a manually curated data set of 104 microbial (meta- genome sequence sameta- genomeisequencee, which included 19 genomesamples metagenomes oforignocellulose degraders and 82 genomes of non-degraders.
Metagenomic data, consisting of short DNA sequences sampled from uncultured microbial communities, are biologically very different from microarray gene expression data (Qin et al., 2010) and represent a new biological application of high-dimensional regression.
DNA microarrays are able to detect microbial sequences from any sample in a parallel and very fast, high throughput way.
DNA microarray development enabled researchers to detect microbial sequences from any sample in a parallel and very fast high throughput manner.
The NGS-based pathogen detection is a new-developing method for scanning the microbial sequences in clinical samples, by which we can easily identify potential pathogens for performing specific antimicrobial treatment.
This, however, is a very simple bacterial community; assembling sequences sampled from most whole microbial communities remains a challenging problem (Pop, 2009).
The library size of microbial sequencing varied greatly among samples, ranging from 3969 to 336 900 reads.
For example, in three separate studies 3 Gb of microbial sequences were generated from fecal samples of only 33 individuals from the USA or Japan [ 2, 29, 37].
4. "I am concerned that all the microbial sequences detected by the authors in brain samples are contaminations".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com