Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Only genes present in all 16 microarrays were considered for further processing.
Only genes, 1266 for ECT pulses and 1805 for EGT pulses, present in both duplicated microarrays were considered for further processing.
For Arabidopsis, these experiments were carried out as a time course, however only the 0.5 h, 1 h and 3 h post-treatment microarrays were considered for analysis as this was considered to be a more parallel reflection of the stress treatments in rice and also, it was the only time points consistent across all 4 stress experiments i.e. heat stress was not sampled after 3 h in Arabidopsis.
Similar(57)
Only antibodies validated by Western blot and protein microarray were considered.
cAll spots on the microarray were considered irrespective of the species.
Sequence differences between the germline and the mtDNA reference sequence tiled on the microarray were considered polymorphisms The microarray software used in this study "learns" as the data set increases, allowing for more statistically significant differentiation between "normal" and "mutant" mitochondrial genotypes [ 55].
In order to determine what fraction of genes that showed differential expression in response to HNF4α knock-down is likely to be bound by HNF4α, we compared our microarray expression data to the ChIP-chip data reported by Odom et al. Only those genes in the Odom's data for which there were probesets on our microarray were considered.
Protein microarray is considered to be one of the key analytical tools for high-throughput protein function analysis.
Microarray is considered one of the most exciting developments in high-throughput technologies.
Microarray is considered a 'close' platform because only the genes spotted on the arrays can be analyzed.
The developed microarray is considered to be the perfect complement for the commercially available diagnostic system TB-Biochip (MDR) [ 22].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com