Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
Upon 1 hour heat shock, 112 of the 2,744 ORFs represented on the T. denticola microarray were found to be induced by at least 1.8 fold.
Twenty probes in the microarray were found to be modified by one of the factors.
Total 19 out of the 29 plastid genes represented on the microarray were found downregulated as a result of both ionophore treatments) (10 remaining ORFs showed no expression).
The two 2 other clock genes, Per2 and Bmal1, not present on the microarray were found significantly affected by ACTH treatment and genotype, respectively.
Seventeen genes (corresponding to 26 ESTs represented by 55 probes in the microarray) were found to be up-regulated at 3-dpe when compared with 7dpe (Table 4).
A total of 203 immune-related genes represented on the HGU133A microarray were found using the search terms "immuno", "lymph", "B-cell", and "T-cell", and by adding 20 of the 24 genes found in the lung study.
Similar(52)
The microarray was found to have a detection limit of 103 cells, although in compost spiking experiments, the detection limit was reduced to 105 cells.
For detection of known respiratory viruses, the Virochip microarray was found to have a sensitivity and specificity comparable to or superior to conventional diagnostic testing [11], [15].
In our experiments, the microarray was found to be more sensitive than the qRT-PCR data.
The rs between the log2FCs determined by RNA-seq and microarray was found to be 0.30 (p-value < 0.0001).
The microarray was found to have a limit of detection of 1 pg/μg of total RNA and a mean slide-to-slide correlation co-efficient of 0.88.
More suggestions(15)
microarray were verified
microarray were isolated
microarray were investigated
microarray were obtained
microarray were normalized
microarray were quantified
microarray were selected
microarray were taken
microarray were done
microarray were considered
microarray were validated
microarray were plotted
microarray were used
microarray were described
microarray were based
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com