Microarray results comparing SED toEX at 16 mo and 3 mo showed no effect of exercise treatment, controlling for age, with no differentially expressed genes (DEGs).
The microarray results were compared with those obtained by standardized typing methods.
The accuracy of the resequencing microarray results was compared to conventional ABI direct sequencing for three subjects.
The microarray results are compared to results from chemical mapping experiments, which do provide constraints.
All quantitative data are expressed as means±S.D. Differences between two groups (SCI microarray results) were compared using a Student's t test.
Methylated consensus motifs of the 17 TFs identified based on the protein microarray results are compared with their known consensus motifs.
To assess how the amount of input RNA affects microarray results, we compared intensities found using 5 versus 100 ng of murine liver RNA (Experiment 2).
To complete the analysis of our microarray results, we compared the C and CT berry transcriptomes at each time point using a SAM unpaired comparison with a FDR of 2%.
When microarray results are compared against each individual Biorep, the results are as follows: in green fruit, correlation of microarray data to Q-PCR data of Biorep 2 and Biorep 3 is 81% and 71.8%, respectively; pink fruit is 88% and 91%, respectively; and red fruit is 75.8% and 85.9%, respectively.
The qPCR and microarray results were compared by plotting the qPCR cycle threshold (Ct) value versus the log2 of the array signal for each miRNA in all nine tissues (representative plots are shown in Figure 1, with the remaining plots shown in Additional Files 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7).
