Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(1)
Higher numbers of microarray probes showing DE were observed in contrast between males of the two strains (n = 410) than in the corresponding female contrast (n = 270).
Similar(59)
Most microarray probes show little variation in gene expression over the time points measured.
Generic primers to the ORF2 region of LINE- 1 and primers designed to detect the copies of LINE-1 that correspond to the upregulated microarray probes, all show a modest but statistically significant ∼1.6 2-fold (P < 0.05) upregulation in Tex19.1 −/− placentas by qRT-PCR (Fig. 6C).
Microarray experiments were performed on three independently prepared samples and probes showing at least a 3-fold change (p<0.05) in signal intensity were selected.
Probes showing the best combination of thermodynamic criteria and strain coverage were selected for microarray manufacturing (Fig. 1f).
Probes showing significant differential gene expression were identified using the Linear Models in Microarrays (LIMMA) library [ 93] of the Bioconductor software package [ 94].
A substantial fraction (31%) of the 55 gene probes showing inconsistent patterns were scored as differentially expressed in only one of the nodule samples examined by 16KPlus microarrays.
More recently, tiling oligonucleotide microarrays with 42 million probes, showed that an average of 1,098 CNVs comprising 0.78% of the human genome were validated between two individuals [ 49].
Because of microarray technique or other unknown factors, some probes show higher expression level at 3h than at 0h.
More than 38% of the microarray probes were found to show statistically significant differences in expression levels between the three cell states (FDR < 0.05).
Differential expression analysis comparing the luminal CD133− samples with the remaining samples identified 1111 microarray probes representing 1046 unique genes showing at least twofold differential expression at an adjusted p value <0.05 (p value by t test with adjustment using the Benjamini-Hochberg method).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com