Sentence examples for microarray probe compared from inspiring English sources

The presence of sequence polymorphisms (e.g., SNPs) in target mRNA can cause less efficient hybridization to the microarray probe compared to a perfectly matched reference sequence, potentially leading to reduced signal intensity measurements and resulting in spurious association results [19].

Our results support that the 16S fragment is the most suited marker for microarray probe design, compared to cyt b and COI fragments.

For these simulations we did not observe the same confounding of parent of origin with family effects and therefore did not need to use the statistic Δ log P. Instead, we scanned the chromosome containing the cognate gene to the microarray probe and compared the fits of mixed models with and without parent of origin effects at each locus.

To investigate the activity of known cell elongation and cell wall-related genes, the microarray probe sets were compared with published lists of genes [ 27, 40].

The two microarray probe annotations were compared to identify the number of probes annotated in each annotation and also to identify the distribution of the number of GO terms assigned to each probe.

The Genbank accession for each candidate reference gene was retrieved from the Illumina microarray probe set and compared to the NCBI RefSeq database (Release 16; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Transcript splicing sites were retrieved from Ensembl http://www.ensembl.org.org

Also, averaging all microarray probes and comparing cases and controls we observed a small (<1%) loss of DNA methylation in the KDM5C mutation group (p = 0.035) also for CpG islands, but not for non-CpG island probes.

Two novel clones were found from the mouse cDNA microarray probe set after comparing sequences with the possible human GABAB1j [11].

Comparing microarray probe enrichment to sequencing read depth for the same sample reveals a high degree of correspondence (Figure 1B).

To quantitatively assess the quality of microarray probes, we directly compare RNA-Seq to Agilent microarrays by processing 231 unique samples from the Allen Human Brain Atlas using RNA-Seq.

Pearson correlation indicated coefficients of 0.984 for 12 compared genes and a p <0.005 when comparing data for microarray probe and correspondent qPCR, corroborating the good reliability of the microarray platform.