Sentence examples for microarray experiments due from inspiring English sources

Real-time PCR is commonly used to validate the mRNA expressions acquired from microarray experiments due to the greater specificity of the primer vs. microarray probes[14].

Missing data is an inevitable phenomenon in gene expression microarray experiments due to instrument failure or human error.

The combination of many gene expression profile datasets from different sources poses the problem of the batch effect, i.e. the systematic differences between batches (groups) of samples in microarray experiments due to purely technical reasons.

The differential regulation of TPS-a and TPS-b transcripts in grapes has not previously been reported in detail in microarray experiments due to poor coverage of the TPS gene family by the available probes.

The batch effects are the systematic differences between batches (groups) of samples in microarray experiments due to technical reasons, such as variability in materials, protocols or operators, possibly introducing a bias able to confound true biological differences (recently reviewed by Luo and coll. [ 30]).

However, data missing is an inevitable phenomenon in gene expression microarray experiment due to many factors, such as instrument failure, human error.

In addition, QPCR of amplified RNA is biased towards recapitulating the results of the microarray experiment due to truncation of the RNA products.

Some of the selected negative cDNA clones may have produced a weakly positive signal in northern or microarray hybridization experiments due to fairly small stretches of sequence similarity to transcripts present in glucose-grown fungus resulting in cross-hybridization.

The use of reference RNA as a normalization tool in microarray experiments reduces bias due to dye incorporation, eliminate the need for dye swap, and can be used for multiple comparisons as detailed elsewhere [25].

In situ analyses revealed a complete loss of Isl1 expression in the right atrium (SAN) of knockout hearts, suggesting that the residual Isl1 expression detected in Shox2 knockout tissue by qRT-PCR and microarray experiments is likely due to some remaining outflow tract tissue following microdissection.

On the other hand, it is also possible that as with all microarray experiments, inconsistencies may be due to slight differences in experimental conditions or processes of preparing cDNA for the array experiments.