Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Microarray analyses examined the temporal differential gene expression of salivary and lacrimal glands of C57BL/6 mice revealed gradual change in pathophysiological related genes from 16 to 20 wks of age, concomitantly, leukocyte infiltration in the exocrine glands is often observed at these ages [ 32, 33].
Similar(59)
Expression ratios for individual genes were examined by microarray analyses (see Supporting Information, Table S1).
To further support the results of our microarray analyses, we examined the expression of GPCRs in a database generated by Cloonan et al., which included libraries from undifferentiated mouse ES cells and EBs at day 4 of formation.
Using DNA microarray analyses, we examined the effects of disruption of each RNase on mRNA abundance.
In a previous study we had used microarray analyses to examine the effects of RA and TSA on embryonal carcinoma cell growth and differentiation using the prototypical EC cell line F9 [ 18].
However, it is essential to keep in mind the important differences in species, growth conditions, method of habituation and type of microarray analyses when examining these results.
Sensitivity analyses examined key assumptions.
In the present study, using miRNA and mRNA microarray analyses, we systematically examined the expression of mRNAs and miRNAs in ARDS, and correlated their expression.
In order to investigate whether the decreased expression of fimbrial genes correlated with decreased fimbrial production, strain χ7122, the pst mutant K3 and the complemented mutant CK3 were grown under conditions used for microarray analyses and were examined by electron microscopy.
Nevertheless, RNA for individual microarray analyses in this study was examined from females only (four females per treatment group) to eliminate any unrecognized sex effects.
According to our microarray analyses, all MMP genes examined were down-regulated in nucleus pulposus cells with co-culture of synovial MSCs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com