Suggestions(2)
Exact(1)
As shown in Figures 6(a) and 6(b), the bladders of three mice were visible under the optical imaging system at 5 h after injection, but tumor grafts were palpable in only two mice.
Similar(59)
At the 5- and 20-min time points after injection of {(Au0)51.2-G5.NHAc} 51.2-G5.NHAc}scular system of the mice was visible on CT (Figure 6I-b, 6I-c), with the heart, renal vein, main portal vein, anDENPsnches of the portal vascularh clearly evident.
The body weight increment in surGasp1 mice is visible at 3 weeks of age.
Although, the Hr-fos mice showed less light from internal structures than the Hr-CMV mice, signal in the extremities of Hr-fos mice was visible as reported previously in fos::luc mice [ 4].
In addition, the black skin coat of the C57BL/6 mouse is visible due to binding of this radiotracer to skin containing melanin (Fig. 7, right panel).
Whereas no tumors were detected in TVA-negative mice, melanomas were visible in DCT-TVA– Ink4a/Arf lox/lox mice as early as 3 weeks.
In some classrooms, the report said, mouse droppings were visible.
In young ApoE−/− mice, no plaques were visible by eye, and Sudan IV staining revealed either no plaque or barely visible tiny areas presumably indicating where plaques would later form.
Thus, to avoid complications associated with metastases, mice were killed and tumors removed after the first treatment period, and dissociated tumor cell suspensions were injected into naïve mice; once tumors were visible 7 days later, treatment was resumed.
Contrary to our expectations, Tek-Ate1 mice were viable and had no visible angiogenesis-related phenotypes, suggesting that Ate1 plays no major role in endothelial cells during development.
Contrary to expectations, Tek-Ate1 mice were viable and had no visible angiogenesis-related phenotypes; however, these mice showed reproductive defects, with high rates of embryonic lethality in the second generation, at stages much earlier than the complete Ate1 knockout strain.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com