Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(24)
Cells from NOD, NOR, and BALB/c mice were sorted into CD4lo and CD4hi T cells.
Naive CD4 T cells isolated from C57BL/6 mice were sorted as CD4+CD44−CD25−CD62L+ cells and injected into syngeneic cd3ε−/− mice.
In the TCRV challenge MY-24 efficacy experiments, mice were sorted into groups of 10 to 15 animals for drug treatment groups and 15 to 25 for the placebo groups.
CD24−CD31−CD45−GFP+ cells from the SVZs of GFP+ mice were sorted using FACS.
The mice were sorted into the following treatment groups (20 mice/group).
Approximately 100,000 cells from a combination of 5 8 mice were sorted per population for each experiment.
Similar(36)
Fos-positive cells in each mouse were sorted according to their coordinates along the rostrocaudal axis, and the probability density function was assessed using Gaussian kernel density estimations [23].
For co-transplantation experiments, the GFP cells engaged in mouse lungs were sorted prior to be used for further injections.
For transfer to B6 and MHCII−/− mice, NCD4 cells were sorted from OT-IIxB6.SJL mice and 5 × 10 cells were transferred i.v. Three or ten days post-transfer recipient mice were euthanized and transferred NCD4 cells were distinguished from endogenous NCD4 cells using CD45.1 as a marker.
Cells from six age-matched (6- to 8-week-old) mice per genotype were sorted for GFP expression for each independent experiment.
ESA-positive cell populations, stained by fluorescein-conjugated anti-mouse ESA antibody, were sorted from MDA-MB-231 parental or -induced cells by using a flow cytometry.
More suggestions(15)
mice were corrected
mice were distinguished
mice were resolved
mice were characterised
individuals were sorted
mice were disaggregated
specimens were sorted
mice were processed
mice were differentiated
mice were trained
mice were administered
mice were subjected
mice were sacrificed
mice were chosen
mice were challenged
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com