Sentence examples for mice this difference from inspiring English sources

However, most phenotypes were more prominent in the immune cell-specific Cic null mice than in the T-cell-specific Cic-deficient mice; this difference implies that T-cell-extrinsic mechanisms also contributed in part to those phenotypes.

While a statistically significant separation of four circulating parameters was recorded between DIED and SUR mice, this difference was not consistent at all time points.

We saw a higher basal level of TNF-α in BALB/c and less IL-2−/− mice; this difference could be due to a basal level activity of IL-2 in BALB/c mice.

Our results show that, although there is also a significant decrease in the total number of Nissl+ cells in the SNc between treated and control mice, this difference is smaller than that between TH+ neurons.

Livers of mutant mice were larger than those of sex-matched WT mice for B6 and F1 mice fed control (B6: p<0.001; F1: p<0.05) and cholate diet (p<0.001 for all), but in 129 mice this difference was only seen after cholate diet (p<0.001).

Although Polg +/D257A mice also showed a similar tendency of higher number of mtDNA point mutations than Polg +/+ mice, this difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 2F).

Interestingly, serum DPP-4 concentrations were significantly higher in apoE-deficient mice than C57BL/6 mice, and this difference increased with age [ 27].

Note: juvenile lab mice have higher median bout lengths than wild mice but this difference disappears in older mice.

We measured free fatty acids in the serum of mice fasted overnight and found that the concentrations tended to be lower in SirT1-null mice than in normal mice; however, this difference was not statistically significant (data not shown).

The number of circulating lymphocytes tended to increase in young, rather than aged, PLA2G3 mice relative to WT mice, although this difference was not statistically significant.

In the colitis-associated tumorigenesis model, the number of macroscopically identified colon tumors increased as expected and showed a tendency to be smaller in Ido1 mice than in Ido1 mice, but this difference was not statistically significant owing to individual variability (Fig. 2a).