Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Histomorphometric observation of nude mice skin samples revealed an increase in number of hair follicles (HFs).
Similar(59)
For epidermal protein, mouse skin samples were placed on an ice-cold glass plate, and the epidermis was removed with a razor blade and placed into RIPA buffer containing 1% Triton X-100, protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich Co., Saint Louis, MO), and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail I, II (Sigma-Aldrich Co).
Collagen density in mouse skin samples was examined by picrosirius red staining, and multiphoton microscopy.
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded mouse skin samples were processed and stained according to routine Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) protocol.
Mast cells were visualized and quantified in mouse skin samples using toluidine blue (TBO) staining (pH = 2).
To analyze miR-203 expression in injured skin, in situ hybridizations were performed on sections of mouse skin samples collected at 3 and 5 days post wounding.
Interestingly, a very different situation applied to mouse skin samples, in which IL-1F8 levels were very high and further increased with inflammation.
To examine the status of hair germ between control and Pofut1/Tgfb3-Cre mice, back skin samples at P22 (telogen) and P24 (early anagen) were analyzed for hair germ markers (Lef1 and P-cadherin) and proliferation status.
At the end of the sensitization protocol, mice were sacrificed and skin samples of the treatment area were taken using biopsy punches (kai medical; kai Europe GmbH, Solingen, Germany) from each mouse.
Skin samples from 70% of mice fed upon by WT-infected nymphs were culture positive, while all skin samples from mice fed upon by the bba64 mutant-colonized nymphs were culture negative (Table 2).
To gain insight of the gene expression profile that may be involved in protection against DNA damage induced by UVB irradiation in Cbl-b−/− mice, we isolated RNA from skin samples taken before and 24 h after UVB irradiation of Cbl-b−/− and WT mice to carry out microarray analyses.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com