Ai Feedback
Exact(18)
The Korean FDA allowed us to administer a PIO dose up to three tablets (45 mg) in each patient.
The amount of Al and Mg in each phase is presented with the same color as the phase, with dotted and dashed lines for Al and Mg, respectively.
In Fig. 15, the amounts of Al and Mg in each phase are presented by dotted and dashed lines, respectively, with the same color as the phase.
(a) Graphene oxide films, (b) graphene films (reduced by ascorbic acid), and (c to g) graphene-Ag composite films (the amount of AgNO3 is from 2 to 300 mg in each film).
(a) Graphene oxide films, (b to d) graphene films (reduced by ascorbic acid), (e to i) graphene-Ag composite films (the amount of AgNO3 was from 2 to 300 mg in each film), and (j) graphite.
(a) Graphite, (b) graphene oxide film, (c to e) graphene films (reduced by ascorbic acid), and (f to j) graphene-Ag composite films (the amount of AgNO3 was from 2 to 300 mg in each film).
Similar(42)
In a previous study evaluating the efficacy of different doses of palonosetron (0.075 mg, 0.25 mg, and 0.75 mg IV in each group), CR was achieved in 44.4% of the 0.25 mg group and 59.3% of the 0.75 mg group in patients receiving Adriamycin/carboplatin or epirubicin/carboplatin.
During the titration period, patients in the ESL 800 mg group started treatment at 400 mg QD, and those in the ESL 1,200 mg group started at 800 mg QD (in each group, the dose was increased by 400 mg at the end of the first week).
We calculated dose by adding all diazepam or morphine milligram (mg) equivalents in each prescription and dividing by the number of days' supply.
The most frequent event was headache, which was reported by a total of 19 subjects and by two (400-mg group) to five subjects (100-mg and 200-mg groups) in each of the five groups.
Naratriptan 2.5 mg is superior to placebo for acute migraine treatment in 6 RCTs, but inferior to sumatriptan 100 mg and rizatriptan 10 mg in one RCT each.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com