Sentence examples for mfc i from inspiring English sources

By convention (2), ¬□A is L-true in MFC, i.e. in MFC ⊨¬□A.

The results showed that MFC-S had a faster startup with higher voltage output compared with MFC-I.

For better understanding of electrode design, two liter-scale microbial fuel cells with staggered array (MFC-S) and inline array (MFC-I) were constructed using graphite rod electrodes.

For a batch feeding mode, compared with MFC-I, MFC-S had a slightly higher COD removal efficiency (84.3%) but much higher coulombic efficiency (82.3%) with a nonuniform segment CE distribution.

Moreover, the maximum power density (23.8 W/m3) of MFC-S was approximately one quarter higher than that of MFC-I (19.1 W/m3) due to the structure-induced better mass transfer of staggered array.

We compared shams (n = 15) with MFC-I rats (n = 15) and MFC-C rats (n = 15).

Post hoc pairwise comparisons (Duncan's) revealed that there was a significant difference between MFC-I and shams (P < 0.05), and a significant difference between MFC-C and shams (P < 0.05).

One-sample t-tests on the mean scores for Block B against a test value of 50% HR choices (chance performance) showed that the MFC-I group did not significantly differ from chance (t = 0.914, P = 0.376), while the MFC-C group was significantly different from chance (t = 11.986, P < 0.001), indicating a significant preference for the low effort/LR option.

We grouped rats according to whether the high effort/HR arm was on the ipsilateral side of space to the lesion (MFC-I, e.g. left hemisphere lesion and left goal arm of the T-maze = high effort/HR) or the contralateral side (MFC-C, e.g. left hemisphere lesion and right goal arm of the T-maze = high effort/HR).

Importantly, however, there was also a significant difference between the MFC-I and MFC-C groups (P < 0.05), confirming that animals that had to turn away from their lesioned side to obtain the HR were much less likely to do so, and now actually exhibited a marked preference for the low effort/LR option on the effort-based T-maze task.

To coincide with the publication of the MfC Part I results, a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals (HCPs), Parkinson's specialists, patients, and their carers worked with the EPDA to develop The European Parkinson's Disease Standards of Care Consensus Statement Volume I [ 14].