Sentence examples for metrics are presented in table from inspiring English sources

The values for the three metrics are presented in Table 2.

Correlation scores for all metrics are presented in Table 2. Figure 11 Experiment 4: scatter results for GIPS E4 VoIP database.

Annotation metrics are presented in Table  4.

System performance metrics are presented in Table 5 for each of the tested scenarios.

With reference to the results from case study number 2, the outcomes belonging to the Chidamber and Kemerer metrics are presented in Table 4.

Linearity metrics are presented in Table 1, along with the average peak apex S/N and mass error at the detection limit, i.e., 5 fg on column for phenol- d6.

More detailed information about the separation metrics is presented in Table 1.

The quality of the solutions, measured by the similarity metrics is presented in Table 3.

A summary of sentence retrieval metrics is presented in Table 1.

> A summary of the annotation metrics is presented in Table 2.

The results with respect to the four performance metrics are presented in Table 3 (Davis dataset), Table 4 (Metz dataset) and Table 5 (KIBA dataset).