Sentence examples for metrics are consistent from inspiring English sources

Metrics are considered consistent if they consistently ranked perfectly assemblies as better; fully consistent metrics are consistent metrics with similar monotonic trends by sequencing depth and read length for perfect assemblies.

This indicates that users obviously deviate from normal pattern and two metrics are consistent in detecting anomalies.

Studies assessing individual metrics are consistent in finding Ephemeroptera (mayflies) as highly sensitive to TDS/SC (Pond 2004, 2010; Hartman et al. 2005; Pond et al. 2008; Timpano 2011; Boehme 2013).

These two metrics are consistent with the sampling programs described where the datasets for some phyla are more accessible than others.

For all of the error conditions above, the computed ABS metrics are consistent with the reference case (condition 1), but with slightly larger relative standard deviations.

Furthermore, if we consider isolate 3 an outlier and exclude it from the analysis, we see that the correlations between murine MSTs and our virulence metrics are consistent to those when only the initial 12 isolates were correlated (Spearman's rho for the 20 clinical isolates: MSTs correlated with test-statistics, r s=−0.840 and P<0.01; MSTs correlated with lifetime values, r s=0.784 and P<0.01).

With small MMUs, most metrics were consistent across grain sizes, from fine (e.g. 0.16 m2) to relatively large (e.g. 16 m2) pixel sizes.

As can be seen, a general tendency of the quality metrics is consistent with their definitions (i.e., the RMSE value tends to decrease as Q e and Q g increases and vice versa with respect to Q o).

The MCP algorithms are compared using a set of performance metrics that are consistent with the ultimate goals of the MCP process.

We sought to identify pattern metrics that are consistent across spatial scale and time – and thus robust measures of vegetation and habitat configuration – for a restored tidal marsh in the San Francisco Bay, CA, USA.

Organizations improve equality and impartiality in performance appraisals by assessing employee performance based on standard decisive factor, aptitude, and metrics that are consistent across other employees in similar job functions.