Suggestions(1)
Exact(3)
We compare the properties of these two methods with exact calculation according to objective criteria and present one example from a study conducted in France.
We compare the proposed methods with exact and heuristic algorithms for mixed integer non-linear programming problems, proving that our approach provides good-quality solutions in smaller CPU time.
Standard contingency table methods, with exact tests and when appropriate Mantel extension trend tests assessed univariate associations of categorical variables with CIN3 and cancer versus
Similar(57)
To solve the resulting discrete nonlinear systems, a Newton method with exact Jacobian matrix is used.
The finite volume (FV) method with exact two-material Riemann problems (FIVER) is an Eulerian computational method for the solution of multi-material flow problems.
Governing equations are simplified to two partial differential equations using displacement potential functions (DPF) which are solved using the separation of variables method with exact satisfaction of boundary conditions.
The accuracy of the proposed scheme is assessed by comparison of the method with exact results obtained either by full finite element simulations in time-domain or by available analytical results obtained by the Laplace transform.
Our framework is based on the Fourier Galerkin method with exact and approximate integrations that has recently been shown to generalize the Lippmann Schwinger setting of the original work by Moulinec and Suquet from 1994.
Since the CPU cost of using the Newton method, with exact gradient and Hessian data at each cycle, becomes prohibitively high, an approach that computes the exact Hessian only once and then updates it in an approximated manner through the BFGS formula, is used instead.
The Finite Volume method with Exact two-material Riemann Problems (FIVER) is both a computational framework for multi-material flows characterized by large density jumps, and an Embedded Boundary Method (EBM) for computational fluid dynamics and highly nonlinear Fluid Structure Interaction (FSI) problems.
Figure 2 Comparisons of exact solution and its approximations at (pmb{z=-10, 0, 2, 5}) with (pmb{varepsilon=0.05}) for Example 1. From Figures 1 and 2, and Table 3, we see that there is almost no difference for the a posteriori and a priori Fourier method with exact a priori bound E when r is relatively small.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com