Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Similar(60)
Surprisingly, based on this modified strategy, we got a better prediction with c-index = 0.628 (Table 1 ), which is even higher than the top two methods with c-indexes of 0.613 and 0.605 in the challenge.
Using this signature gene set, we can get a c-index of 0.599, which is very competitive compared to the top two methods, with c-indexes of 0.613 and 0.605, respectively (M. Bansal et al., personal communication).
Beam patterns of the HOT method and the LVF method with c δ 0=20 dB, and d δ 0=23 dB.
(Delta t) = 0 if the true peak of the master correlogram the maximum amplitude Fig. 6 Comparison of correction value (Delta t) by new method to against the MC method; the PS method with C min = 0.30 (a), 0.20 (b), 0.15 (c), and the CA method (d).
Figure 3A depicts the SEIF i obtained from the orthogonal polynomial method with c 2 for the 170 individuals.
The ROC curves show that the predictive discrimination of the essential method was comparable with that of the WHO-ISH method with C statistics 0.788 955% confidence interval 0.721 to 0.855) and 0.744 (0.673 to 0.815), respectively (fig 3).
The randomisation was carried out by the JCOG data centre using a minimisation method with c-stage (IB vs II) and institutions as balancing factors.
In the presence of only AWGN, Fig. 3 a d shows the BLER comparisons between the two considered detection methods with N c set to 8, 16, 32 and 64, respectively.
Fig. 8 Reconstructions of a diamond anvil cell experiment with missing projections, using: a the standard gridrec reconstruction with the Shepp Logan filter, b the standard iterative SIRT method with 100 iterations, and c the proposed SIRT-FBP method with 100 approximated iterations.
Because imputation error rates with method D were only slightly higher than imputation error rates with method C, method D is an attractive alternative for routine procedures, once the DAG from method C is obtained.
In present research, turbidimetric method with Bioscreen C was used to determine how different growth conditions affected LAB growth and bacteriocin production.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com