Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(24)
The concentrations obtained with both methods were statistically compared.
The differences between the two methods were statistically significant at baseline (p = 0.02).
Deer density estimates by the four methods were statistically similar at all effort levels simulated.
The results of the proposed methods were statistically compared with those obtained using the reference method [11].
Both methods were statistically correlated using a 25-run, five-factor multiple-level d-optimal mixture design.
Modelled maximum power and annual energy values obtained through both methods were statistically compared to the experimental ones.
Similar(36)
To further verify whether the differences between these methods are statistically significant, we use approximate randomization [35] for statistical significance testing on F-beta.
The reliabilities of the three methods are statistically evaluated and compared.
The difference between the two methods was statistically significant (p < 0.005) (chi-squared).
The proposed methods are statistically more powerful and computationally more efficient than existing ones.
In this study, impact of initial ensembles on posterior distribution of ensemble-based assimilation methods is statistically analyzed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com