Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(16)
For 15O-water, the differences between the two methods were small.
The differences between the other methods were small, although GAM and MARS provided marginally the best stability and performance.
Compared to the effect of high-pass filtering, differences between the five analyzed methods were small, with extended Infomax performing best.
If a trait was controlled by a moderate number of genes, the absolute differences between the various methods were small, but BayesA was also found to be the most accurate method.
The differences in the standardized means and the 95 % CIs between the two methods were small.
Also, the limits of agreement between the traditional true-size films and the three other methods were small.
Similar(44)
The average errors of the OBC methods were smaller than that of the HCT method.
In the simulation results, the MSE averages of the proposed methods were smaller than that of the other adaptive localization methods and robust positioning algorithms.
LV volumes determined using both methods were smaller in women than in men.
However, the differences between imputation methods are small in non-extreme conditions of missing data.
Compared to the different parameterisation schemes, the difference among the improved non-tracer methods is small.
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com