Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
For the critical review, the period of cost tracking, classification of costs and cost counting methods were noted.
High R2 indexes, indicating high agreement between the two methods were noted: i) 0.9915, ii) 0.9986, iii) 0.9941, and iv) 0.9990.
Statistical methods were noted, including which covariables were considered and adjusted for.
No significant differences in comparability of the two methods were noted between high- and low-resistance areas.
No significant differences in the use of modern methods were noted between wealth quintiles, levels of education, and the time taken to reach the nearest government health facility.
Questions about the validity of these comparisons must be taken in account, since many pitfalls in primary composite endpoints and CV adjudication methods were noted [ 73].
Similar(53)
Advantages and shortcomings of both methods are noted.
However, for over-consolidated (OC) soils at shallow depths, certain variations between different methods are noted.
Therefore, while biases between extraction methods are noted in the literature (Stach et al.2001), the variation observed in 454 pyrosequencing studies presented here may be primarily the result of variation arising during post-nucleic acid extraction processes (Schloss et al.2011; Zhou et al.2011).2011
(The few exceptions requiring alternative methods are noted as a footnote in Table 1 and detailed in the Methods section).
The relationships among pancrustacean lineages are highly unstable, but several interesting findings resolved using various methods are noted.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com