Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(3)
The average mass recoveries from these two imaging methods were greater than 95% for domain-average NAPL saturations of approximately 2.6 × 10− 2, and were approximately 90% during seven cycles of surfactant flushing that sequentially reduced the average NAPL saturation to 7.5 × 10− 4.
The differences between the methods were greater in the promoter benchmark (Fig. 2, Table 4).
Compared to penicillin, differences between the two surveillance methods were greater for extended-spectrum cephalosporins and erythromycin.
Similar(57)
Variations observed with these 3 methods are greater than variations considered as reasonable in clinical practice.
Bias between methods was greater at high PEEP, and further increased when high PEEP was combined with low VT.
Our methods yield p values in the order of 10−3, whereas the most significant p value from the existing methods is greater than 0.17.
The advantage of marker-based methods is greater for selection at a young age, before information on sibs of selection candidates is available.
All wide-angle peak intensities of NiO/SBA-15 obtained with direct synthesis method were greater than those with post synthesis method.
Moreover, the selectivity and reproducibility of this method were greater in comparison with IMAC and MOAC.
These methods are great renovations over the conventional t-statistic based or other gene-level consistency-based methods.
The advantages of these methods are greatest when residual covariances differ from zero.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com