Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
Different VES methods were extracted from ERT with DD array and converted into a Schlumberger array.
Data regarding methods were extracted from each review independently by 2 reviewers.
Evidence review: Overall 49 studies were recognized for all assessment methods with five major decisive factors of causality evaluation, all the information regarding reasons allocating causality, the advantages and limitations of the appraisal methods were extracted and scrutinized.
Age, gender, location (anterior, posterior, base, ventral), presenting symptoms, size, and treatment methods were extracted from case reports.
For this comparison, only those hotspot locations commonly identified by both the methods were extracted, and their matching rate was computed with respect to the total area of hotspots.
Study population and setting, disease status, and recruitment methods were extracted.
Similar(48)
Ten texture features from the three texture analyses methods are extracted to correlate with the observed mechanical properties.
The land cover categories with the highest individual classification accuracies determined based on these two methods are extracted and merged into combined land cover classifications.
All the methods are extracted by removing the other codes by simple program developed in Java.
With the help of these metric values the near equal methods are extracted and are subjected to textual comparison to detect potential clone pairs.
After the survey was conducted, the control parameters for both methods are extracted and compared with each other in Table 5.
More suggestions(14)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com