Suggestions(1)
Exact(5)
The other 6 methods were each used only once.
FT-phase and FT-magnitude methods were each applied to identify peak-inspiration projections and quantitatively compared to the gold standard of visual identification.
Thus, the three classifications, despite their different methods, were each able to identify longleaf pine forest community types.
The other methods were each used in 5 to 10% of the references found in this study.
When compared with any other method of teaching these two methods were each separately favoured significantly more (p < 0.05).
Similar(55)
Although these two methods are each affected by their own shortcoming, the source of errors in the two methods is different and independent.
For each dataset, both GenCo and our method were each run 10 times, taking 20 random permutations of haplotype order in each iteration.
Hence, the gm values estimated by the three methods were consistent with each other.
The results from both methods were compared with each other.
Both methods were calibrated against each other.
Three different scoring methods were assessed for each model.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com