Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(31)
METHODS:We considered interactions between 11,441 SNPs within 80 candidate genes related to hormone biosynthesis and metabolism and insulin-like growth factors with six hormone-related factors (oral contraceptive use, parity, endometriosis, tubal ligation, hormone replacement therapy, and estrogen use) and assessed whether these interactions differed between obese and non-obese women.
To benchmark these methods, we considered multiple cancer gene lists compiled by various groups34,35,36,37 (Table 2).
Click here for a detailed description of our methodology, and the alternative methods we considered.
To evaluate the performance merits of the proposed methods, we considered two different scenarios.
This is also the case for other compression methods we considered.
According to "Methods," we considered NAMs with periods of approximately 4, 5, 7, 10, and 16 days.
Similar(29)
The methods we consider include first- and second-order semi-implicit, fully implicit, and operator-splitting techniques.
This is in contrast with two other methods we consider (a fixed-design residual-based bootstrap and a pairs bootstrap) whose distributions are incorrectly centered at zero.
By variational methods we consider a p-biharmonic equation with nonlocal term on unbounded domain.
The sampling methods we consider are the following: Sampling 1: Sampling of co-presence times.
The combined methods we consider are denoted by MP-SA, OMP-SA, and BP-SA.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com