To benchmark the optimal assignment methods, we compared the results with FieldScreen, the 166 bit MACCS keys and DOCK.
Methods: We compared the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance catheter-associated BSI rate between the non-US and US units.
Methods: We compared 45 CFS and 40 multiple sclerosis (MS) outpatients on measures of functional ability, fatigue severity, depressive symptoms, somatic symptom attribution and illness worry.
Patients and methods We compared 31 prospectively recruited comatose patients suffering from severe brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale <8; 16 traumatic and 15 anoxic cases) to 14 age-matched healthy participants.
In order to further verify the effectiveness of our proposed methods, we compared the proposed muting algorithm with the reference muting algorithms in G.722 Appendix IV [21] and Kovesi [22] under conditions of various packet loss rates.
Since this approach attempts to invert biohashes in a similar setup with our proposed methods, we compared it with our algorithms in terms of verification errors and computation times.
Methods: We compared health boards in terms of treatment patterns of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases adjusting for differences in age, gender, and deprivation status.
Research design and methods: We compared 114 participants in a diabetes intervention programme with 201 as yet non-referred outpatients, of whom 54 outpatients were considered eligible for the intervention by their diabetologists; thus, 147 outpatients were considered non-eligible.
Patients and methods: We compared prospectively 9 patients hospitalized for septic shock in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) of the teaching hospital La Timone-Marseille to 10 control patients hospitalized in the same unit for another reason (cardiac arrest, trauma).
Based on graph-theoretic methods, we compared the habitats with or without orchards and evaluated the contribution of orchards to the whole network connectivity and its three fractions (intra, flux and connector), and then analyzed the species that could benefit the most from the habitat supplement.
Once lists of genes and pathways whose mRNA expression responded to PDGF-BB treatment were assembled by the above methods, we compared the lists to see which genes had responded to treatment uniquely in one of the nulls or wild type, or common to two or more of the null and wild type conditions.
