Sentence examples for methods was small from inspiring English sources

The difference of relative errors between the two methods was small (0.54 0.68%) compared to the uncertainty associated to the standard method (± 3%).

The average difference in length between the hinge loops determined by the improved and original methods was small (1.4 residues), and the centers of the determined hinge loops only differed by 0.8 residue on average.

Although the difference in accuracy between the three LDP SNP selection methods was small or absent, Methods 2 and 3 reduced the variation in imputation accuracy across SNPs (see Figure  2 and Additional file 5: Figure S2).

For the PAGAN dataset (see Supplementary Table S1), the difference among these three methods was small, but a slight tendency was observed that PAGAN performed better for easy cases and that –addfragments performed better for difficult cases.

Results showed that variability among the methods was small when compared with overall source-apportionment model uncertainty, and suggested that these apportionment methods may be useful in discerning source-specific health effects.

It should be noted that the difference between the two methods was small and similar to what has been found for repeated infusion protocols [ 12, 15, 16], therefore one has to be careful with regard to any clinical implications.

For non-chemical names, the difference between the two methods was smaller: although the maximum F-measure of the length-normalized edit distance was larger than that of SoftTFIDF, SoftTFIDF may be better if we prioritize precision.

For 15O-water, the differences between the two methods were small.

However, the differences between imputation methods are small in non-extreme conditions of missing data.

Compared to the different parameterisation schemes, the difference among the improved non-tracer methods is small.

The differences between the other methods were small, although GAM and MARS provided marginally the best stability and performance.