Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
PFGE presented more profiles than RAPD; however, the combination of both methods was more discriminatory than PFGE alone.
The correlation of hemodynamic parameters measured by two methods was more pronounced in patients without a high dose of inotropes.
First, the division of RT methods was more exact and useful than the classes used in pair-wise meta-analysis.
The combination of the two typing methods was more discriminatory as compared to the use of a single method.
The use of both methods was more informative than the use of only one of these methods.
The combination of both methods was more cost-effective: Distributing single-sided questionnaire with an option to reply via the internet cost £25.20 per extra response.
Similar(51)
Usually the methods were more subtle.
And their methods are more applicable to practice application.
The other methods are more conservative.
Direct-heat methods are more efficient and usually tastier.
Contemporary stylometric methods are more sophisticated, but the difference is one of degree, rather than kind.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com