Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
However, the performance of these measures on alternative module detection methods was generally worse than randomly selecting parameters.
In fact, except for FABIA (Factor Analysis for Bicluster Acquisition), the performance of the latter methods was generally not much better or even worse than random permutations of the known modules.
In spite of the attempt of harmonization, quantitative agreement between methods was generally not satisfactory and methods could not be used interchangeably.
Agreement between the two methods was generally good for the majority of situations tested.
The difference in accuracy between the two methods was generally small, with the exception of T1.
Knowledge of symptoms based on recall methods was generally lower than in studies that used recognition methods.
Similar(48)
The peaks that were generated by these two methods were generally consistent (90 to 97% coincidence).
The other allowed methods are generally less advantageous.
Conventional engineering design methods are generally deterministic.
More effective and less costly methods are generally needed.
The agreement between these methods is generally good.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com