Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(60)
Fairly good agreement between these two methods was found.
Considerable variation in the reliability and validity of the methods was found.
A relation between the response of different characterisation methods was found.
Agreement with more time consuming classical distortion measurement methods was found to be good.
Activation by three fundamentally different methods was found effective in enhancing both the ignitability and the burn rate.
No significant difference among methods was found for the number of species collected as mature seeds, but SS, implemented on larger plots, tended to collect more forb species.
Nevertheless, no difference (P > 0.05) in in vitro fertilizing capacity between spermatozoa collected by means of the two different methods was found.
A good relationship between the two methods was found which allows for investigation into the energy analysis of the armature and the chestform.
The binding affinity of the imprinted polymers to the NA analogs, as studied by colorimetric methods, was found to be efficient and highly selective.
No statistically significant difference between the results obtained by the two methods was found (3.09 ± 0.50 vs 5.30 ± 2.92 Mg C ha− 1).
An ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC MS/MS) method was developed to confirm the accuracy and precision of the FPIA, and no obvious difference in recovery between these two methods was found.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com